Last month, the Supreme Court issued several significant rulings. These include upholding the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s funding structure, deciding that courts must determine which contract governs when there are conflicting forum selection and arbitration clauses, and ruling that public officials cannot use their positions to punish or suppress speech they oppose. The following decision alerts offer analysis and practical takeaways. Click the links below to read more about each decision.

Decision Alert: Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Public Officials Cannot Use Their Positions To Punish or Suppress Those Advocating for Positions They Disagree With

The Supreme Court unanimously held in National Rifle Association of America. v. Vullo, that the NRA’s allegations that state officials coerced private companies to blacklist the group because of its political views stated a claim under the First Amendment. Justice Sotomayor authored the opinion. Read the full synopsis here.  

Decision Alert: Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of CFPB’s Funding Structure

In Consumer Fin. Protection Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Services Assn. of Am., the Court held that the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in 12 U.S.C. § 5497 satisfies the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause. Read the full synopsis here.

Decision Alert: Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Courts Will Decide Which Contract Governs When There Are Conflicting Forum Selection and Arbitration Clauses

The Supreme Court unanimously held in Coinbase Inc. v. Suski that when parties enter into two contracts—one requiring an arbitrator to decide the arbitrability of the dispute and the other giving a court the jurisdiction to decide controversies—the decision of which contract will govern will be decided by the courts. Justice Jackson authored the opinion. Read the full synopsis here.

For more information, please contact Chantel Febus, James Azadian, Cory Webster, Christopher SakauyeMonika Harris, Puja Valera, or A. Joseph Duffy, IV.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Chantel Febus Chantel Febus

Chantel Febus is a Member in Dykema’s Washington, D.C., Office and serves as the firm’s Head of East Coast Appeals. As a Member of the Appellate and Critical Motions, Business Litigation, and Government Investigations and Corporate Compliance practices, Chantel partners with clients to

Chantel Febus is a Member in Dykema’s Washington, D.C., Office and serves as the firm’s Head of East Coast Appeals. As a Member of the Appellate and Critical Motions, Business Litigation, and Government Investigations and Corporate Compliance practices, Chantel partners with clients to navigate novel legal issues and emergent legal challenges.

Photo of James Azadian James Azadian

James Azadian is a Member in Dykema’s Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., offices and serves as the firm’s West Coast Appellate Chair and co-leader of the nationwide Appellate and Critical Motions Practice. Jimmy specializes in complex federal and state court commercial litigation raising…

James Azadian is a Member in Dykema’s Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., offices and serves as the firm’s West Coast Appellate Chair and co-leader of the nationwide Appellate and Critical Motions Practice. Jimmy specializes in complex federal and state court commercial litigation raising cutting-edge and core business issues, the First Amendment to the Constitution, Article I of the California Constitution, and the application of California’s anti-SLAPP statute in federal court.

Photo of Christopher Sakauye Christopher Sakauye

Chris Sakauye represents insurers in complex coverage matters. He is adept at assessing and applying current and developing trends in case law across all 50 states. His experience on a nationally recognized trial team also gives him unique insight into the pressure points…

Chris Sakauye represents insurers in complex coverage matters. He is adept at assessing and applying current and developing trends in case law across all 50 states. His experience on a nationally recognized trial team also gives him unique insight into the pressure points that bring difficult cases to quick and efficient resolutions.