Last week, the Supreme Court continued to issue significant rulings. These include unanimously holding that abortion medication objectors lack standing to challenge FDA decisions related to the use of the medication, striking down ATF’s classification of “bump stocks” as machineguns, and unanimously upholding the USPTO’s refusal to register a “TRUMP TOO SMALL” trademark. The following decision alerts offer analysis and practical takeaways. Click the links below to read more about each decision.

Decision Alert: Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Abortion Medication Objectors Lack Standing

On June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court unanimously held in U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine and Danco Laboratories v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine that plaintiffs objecting to the use of mifepristone, commonly referred to as the “abortion pill” because it blocks a hormone necessary for a pregnancy to continue, lack standing to bring their suit. Justice Kavanaugh authored the opinion for the Court.

Decision Alert: Supreme Court Unanimously Upholds Patent and Trademark Office’s Refusal to Register “TRUMP TOO SMALL” Trademark

On June 13, 2024, in Vidal v. Elster, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Lanham Act’s restriction of trademarks based on a living person’s name does not violate the First Amendment. The case marks the first time the Court has held that a solely content-based restriction on trademark registration need not be evaluated under heightened scrutiny. Even though the decision was unanimous, the justices’ reasoning was not.

Decision Alert: Supreme Court Strikes Down ATF’s Classification of “Bump Stocks” as Machineguns

On June 14, 2024, the Supreme Court held in Garland v. Cargill that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) exceeded its authority by classifying bump stocks as machineguns and, thus, banned. Justice Thomas authored the opinion. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor authored the dissent, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson.

For more information, please contact Chantel Febus, James Azadian, Cory Webster, Christopher SakauyeMonika Harris, Puja Valera, or A. Joseph Duffy, IV.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Chantel Febus Chantel Febus

Chantel Febus is a Member in Dykema’s Washington, D.C., Office and serves as the firm’s Head of East Coast Appeals. As a Member of the Appellate and Critical Motions, Business Litigation, and Government Investigations and Corporate Compliance practices, Chantel partners with clients to

Chantel Febus is a Member in Dykema’s Washington, D.C., Office and serves as the firm’s Head of East Coast Appeals. As a Member of the Appellate and Critical Motions, Business Litigation, and Government Investigations and Corporate Compliance practices, Chantel partners with clients to navigate novel legal issues and emergent legal challenges.

Photo of James Azadian James Azadian

James Azadian is a Member in Dykema’s Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., offices and serves as the firm’s West Coast Appellate Chair and co-leader of the nationwide Appellate and Critical Motions Practice. Jimmy specializes in complex federal and state court commercial litigation raising…

James Azadian is a Member in Dykema’s Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., offices and serves as the firm’s West Coast Appellate Chair and co-leader of the nationwide Appellate and Critical Motions Practice. Jimmy specializes in complex federal and state court commercial litigation raising cutting-edge and core business issues, the First Amendment to the Constitution, Article I of the California Constitution, and the application of California’s anti-SLAPP statute in federal court.

Photo of Christopher Sakauye Christopher Sakauye

Chris Sakauye represents insurers in complex coverage matters. He is adept at assessing and applying current and developing trends in case law across all 50 states. His experience on a nationally recognized trial team also gives him unique insight into the pressure points…

Chris Sakauye represents insurers in complex coverage matters. He is adept at assessing and applying current and developing trends in case law across all 50 states. His experience on a nationally recognized trial team also gives him unique insight into the pressure points that bring difficult cases to quick and efficient resolutions.