Photo of David Ter-Petrosyan

David Ter-Petrosyan is an associate in Dykema’s Los Angeles office. He practices within the firm’s Business Litigation and Appellate and Critical Motions groups. David earned his Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law and his Bachelor of Arts in Economics from California State University, Northridge. While in law school, he externed full-time during a semester for the Honorable Kim McLane Wardlaw of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

On December 8, 2025, the Justices heard oral argument in Trump v. Slaughter (No. 25-332). The Supreme Court plans to decide (1) whether the statutory removal protections for independent, multi-member federal agencies violate the separation of powers (and, if so, whether the Supreme Court should sack its 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States) and (2) whether the judiciary has the power to prevent one’s removal from public office.Continue Reading Supreme Court To Determine Whether the President Can Remove Members of Multi-Member Federal Agencies

On November 5, 2025, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Learning Resources v. Trump, consolidated with Trump v. VOS Selections (consolidated as No. 24-1287) to consider whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose trade tariffs pursuant to declared national emergencies. If the Court concludes that the tariffs are statutorily authorized, the Justices will then decide whether the tariffs constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to the President. So far, this is the most important case the Justices have agreed to hear this term.Continue Reading Supreme Court Weighs Extent of President’s Authority to Impose Tariffs During Proclaimed National Emergencies